Reilly’s special advisor paid €160,000 for 80% of his time, works here ‘on average’ 2 weeks a month

Posted in Blog by saraburke on February 17, 2012

Minister James Reilly’s  much heralded special advisor Martin Connor, who is the most senior health policy advisor in the Department of Health’s Special Delivery Unit, is also a research fellow in Stanford University, in the heart of the silicon valley in California.Connor’s position was announced last June when was he initially appointed for six monhs. According to resposnes from the Department of Health on 16 February 2012, ‘ On foot of a Government Decision the services of Dr Martin Connor were re-engaged on a contract for services basis on an all in fixed price of €480,000 (incl expenses). Dr Connor’s contract for service is for the period 04 December 2011 to 03 December 2014.’ That means he is being paid €160,000 a year for three years. When appointed as special advisor, Martin Connor was also appointed to the HSE’s Interim Board.

Martin Connor’s role is an important one as the most senior ‘expert’ in the special delivery unit which is ‘a key part of the plans to radically reform the health system with the ultimate goal of introducing universal health insurance’. When introduced on 1 June 2011, the minister said that Connor would report directly to him as minister and would concentrate on reducing trolley waits in Emergency Departments and cutting waiting times for public patients on hospitals.

The Minister alongside Martin Connor and Tony O’Brien held a press briefing two weeks ago to report on progress made by the Special Delivery Unit in Emergency Departments and new targets for wait times.  And early figures indicate some progress has been made in the intractable areas of trolleys and long waiting lists. Such progress is very welcome.

Martin Connor comes with good credentials, he is credited with reducing wait times for treatment in Northern Ireland, when he was special policy advisor to the Department of health there from 2005 to 2008. Previously he worked as director for health reform in the greater Manchester Strategic Authority.

He his now ‘Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy and Practice in Stanford University where he is studying integrated  care and its potential for health reform.

Word was out in the health system that Martin Connor worked here just eight days out of 24 and was based in California. When I asked the Department of Health how much of his time was dedicated to his special delivery unit work and where was he based, I was told, ‘The time commitment is of the order of 80%. Dr Connor is currently completing a research fellowship in Stanford University. He is in Ireland for two weeks a month on average but also conducts work by teleconference on a daily basis.’ Teleconferences on a daily basis must be difficult given the time difference between California and Dublin.

There is no questioning Martin Connor’s track record. Having sat through two long press briefings with him in October and Janaury, he is impressive, comes across as someone on top of his brief and early indicators are that progress is being made in hospital wait times.

However, given that he is paid €160,000 for 80% of his time, that means his annual earnings are equivalent to €200,000 per annum, higher than any other ministerial advisor and well above the cap set by the government that hired him. And he is not in Ireland ‘on average’ half of the time.

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Baron von Biffo said, on February 17, 2012 at 8:17 am

    Ms. Burke,

    Being a ministerial adviser is hardly the same as being a production line worker where clocking on and off is the order of the day. Research, planning and policy development can be done anywhere in the world at any time.

    You are at pains to point out the equivalent salary for someone working exclusively in the role but you don’t discount that figure to reflect the fact that Connor doesn’t receive expenses. That’s a tad disingenuous don’t you think?

    For the record, I’m not a supporter of this government or the minister but I think public debate is better served if we resist the urge to massage the facts.


    von Biffo.

    • saraburke said, on February 21, 2012 at 5:53 am

      I quote the response in full from the Department of Health ie that the amount paid is inclusive of expenses, so I am reporting the facts, it’s your call as a reader (and others) as to whether the content is disingenuous and or massaging the facts.
      I assume you are not Baron von Biffo – I think the public debate is better served if people go by their real names no pseudonyms, apologies if you are really Baron von Biffo!

      • Baron von Biffo said, on February 23, 2012 at 2:58 am

        Thank you for your reply.

        As a national journalist you are a powerful and influential person in our society. How you choose to present a story is very important and I think that in this instance you got the presentation wrong.

        As for my using a nomme de plume – For the past two years I’ve posted to as Baron von Biffo and in doing so I’m just continuing a long and noble tradition. 400 years ago Dean Swift published pamphlets under various pseudonyms and you’ll agree that he, and others since (including Doctor Grammar and NoraBatty on your blog), didn’t damage public debate by contributing anonymously.

      • saraburke said, on February 24, 2012 at 11:12 pm

        Thank you for yours although I think you over estimate my power and influence. I think this story is in the public interest which is why I have done it and have covered it in that way. My call not yours!

  2. Marcus de Brun said, on February 17, 2012 at 10:39 am

    “four legs good two legs better”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: